The market share for Spip decreased by 0.008 percentage points (from 0.033% to 0.025%) for all sites, more than any other segment during the same period of time.
|Top 1K sites||Top 10K sites||Top 100K sites||Top 1M sites||All Sites|
Websites using Spip were found on 81 top level domains
|Technologies||Tech Report (Websites)||Compare|
|Apache||Spip & Apache (3,208)||Spip vs. Apache|
|Nginx||Spip & Nginx (613)||Spip vs. Nginx|
|Debian||Spip & Debian (344)||Spip vs. Debian|
|Cloudflare||Spip & Cloudflare (234)||Spip vs. Cloudflare|
|Google Hosted Libraries||Spip & Google Hosted Libraries (149)||Spip vs. Google Hosted Libraries|
|cdnjs||Spip & cdnjs (118)||Spip vs. cdnjs|
|jQuery CDN||Spip & jQuery CDN (88)||Spip vs. jQuery CDN|
|Ubuntu||Spip & Ubuntu (80)||Spip vs. Ubuntu|
|jsDelivr||Spip & jsDelivr (61)||Spip vs. jsDelivr|
|CentOS||Spip & CentOS (41)||Spip vs. CentOS|
|Windows Server||Spip & Windows Server (36)||Spip vs. Windows Server|
We detected the following sites were using Spip
A CMS will sometimes include a meta tag within the html of each page. This is usually a "generator" tag like <meta name="generator" content="What CMS" /> but could also be "application-name", "Powered-By" or anyting else the CMS creators decide to use.
HTTP headers can provide some of the best clues about a site's CMS. The values of set-cookie and x-powered-by headers are the most common and easiest to find.
If a CMS doesn't have meta tags, it will often have other uniquely identifiable html markup. This can range from unique html comments, ids or classes.
In addition to detecting the CMS, in some cases we are able to accurately detect which version of the CMS is being used.
Dedicated Content Management System Detection