The market share for Pelican decreased by 0.001 percentage points (from 0.002% to 0.001%) for all sites, more than any other segment during the same period of time.
|Top 1K sites||Top 10K sites||Top 100K sites||Top 1M sites||All Sites|
Websites using Pelican were found on 42 top level domains
|Technologies||Tech Report (Websites)||Compare|
|Nginx||Pelican & Nginx (75)||Pelican vs. Nginx|
|GitHub Pages||Pelican & GitHub Pages (44)||Pelican vs. GitHub Pages|
|Apache||Pelican & Apache (40)||Pelican vs. Apache|
|Fastly||Pelican & Fastly (39)||Pelican vs. Fastly|
|Cloudflare||Pelican & Cloudflare (34)||Pelican vs. Cloudflare|
|Ubuntu||Pelican & Ubuntu (16)||Pelican vs. Ubuntu|
|Google Hosted Libraries||Pelican & Google Hosted Libraries (15)||Pelican vs. Google Hosted Libraries|
|Ruby||Pelican & Ruby (13)||Pelican vs. Ruby|
|Ruby on Rails||Pelican & Ruby on Rails (13)||Pelican vs. Ruby on Rails|
|cdnjs||Pelican & cdnjs (11)||Pelican vs. cdnjs|
|Octopress||Pelican & Octopress (11)||Pelican vs. Octopress|
We detected the following sites were using Pelican
A CMS will sometimes include a meta tag within the html of each page. This is usually a "generator" tag like <meta name="generator" content="What CMS" /> but could also be "application-name", "Powered-By" or anyting else the CMS creators decide to use.
If a CMS doesn't have meta tags, it will often have other uniquely identifiable html markup. This can range from unique html comments, ids or classes.
In addition to detecting the CMS, in some cases we are able to accurately detect which version of the CMS is being used.
Dedicated Content Management System Detection